The Journal of the DuPage County Bar Association

Home

President's Page

Editor's Page

Judicial Profiles

Judge Thomas J. Riggs

Judge Kathryn E. Creswell

Judge Bonnie M. Wheaton

Judge Hollis L. Webster

Judge William J. Bauer

Judge John T. Elsner

What's Inside

Letters to the Editor

Photo Galleries

Online Version

Advertising

Subscriptions

Back Issues

Vol 24 (2011-12)

Vol 23 (2010-11)

Vol 22 (2009-10)

Vol 21 (2008-09)

Vol 20 (2007-08)

Vol. 19 (2006-07)

Vol. 18 (2005-06)

Vol. 17 (2004-05)

Vol. 16 (2003-04)

Vol. 15 (2002-03)

Vol. 14 (2001-02)

Vol. 13 (2000-01)

Vol. 12 (1999-00)

Vol. 11 (1998-99)

Vol. 10 (1997-98)

Vol. 9 (1997)

1997 Article List

1996 Article List

1995 Article List

1994 Article List

1993 Article List

1992 Article List

1991 Article List

1990 Article List

1989 Article List

Submissions

Author's Agreement

Publication Schedule

Author MCLE Credit

Back Issues > Vol. 17 (2004-05)

Jury Trials in Chancery Cases

Traditionally, the right to trial by jury in civil cases has been restricted to legal matters rather than equitable matters. Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution of the United States provides that the trial of crimes shall be by jury. The Seventh Amendment of the Constitution, being part of the Bill of Rights which ensured ratification of the Constitution as the law of the land, preserved the right of trial by jury "in suits at common law" where the value in controversy exceeds twenty dollars. Why then, are our chancery courtrooms outfitted with jury boxes?

The Illinois constitution does not grant a right to trial by jury in equitable matters, however it likewise does not preclude it.1 The Code of Civil procedure speaks to the issue of jury trials in two separate sections: 2-701 (d) and 2-1111.

Section 2-1111 provides in pertinent part: "The court may in its discretion direct an issue or issues to be tried by a jury, whenever it is judged necessary in any action seeking equitable relief."2 Section 2-701, governing declaratory judgments, provides in pertinent part: "If a proceeding under this Section involves the determination of issues of fact triable by a jury, they shall be tried and determined in the same manner as issues of fact are tried and determined in other civil actions in the court in which the proceeding is pending."3

The Illinois Supreme Court has ruled that the provisions of section 2-701 of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding determination of factual disputes in Declaratory Judgment cases are procedural and do not create the absolute right to a jury.4 Rather, that decision is left to the discretion of the court.5

The key inquiry therefore comes down to the nature of the case to be determined. If the case seeks solely equitable relief (as in merely a declaratory judgment and no legal remedy), the right to a trial by jury is determined by an examination of the predominant characteristics of the factual issues.6 If the case seeks more than a mere declaration of rights, the nature of the additional relief determines the right to a trial by jury.7

Even if a jury demand is properly made at the initiation of the lawsuit, as counts are resolved by motion practice, the right to a jury may disappear. In that event, counsel should consider filing a motion to strike the jury demand if it is determined that a bench trial is preferable.

1 Lazarus v. Northbrook, 31 Ill2d 46 (1964)

2 735 ILCS 5/2-1111

3 735 ILCS 5/2-701 (d)

4 See Berk v. County of Will, 34 Ill. 2d 588, 218 N.E. 2d 98 (1966).

5 Wieneke v. Weitekamp, 229 Ill. App. 3d 520, 593 N.E.2d 158, 170 Ill. Dec. 616 (5th Dist. 1992).

6 Lazarus v. Northbrook.

7 Id.


____________________________________________________________

The DCBA BRIEF is the Journal of the DuPage County Bar Association (“DCBA”). Unless otherwise stated, all content herein is the property of the DCBA and may not be reprinted in whole or in part without the express written permission of the DCBA. © 2008 DCBA. Opinions and positions expressed in articles appearing in the DCBA BRIEF are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the DCBA or any of its members. Neither the author(s) nor the publisher is engaged, in this publication, in rendering legal or other professional advice and this publication is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. If you require legal or other expert advice, you should seek the services of a competent attorney or other professional. PUBLICATION GUIDELINES: All submitted materials must state the author’s surname and be signed by the author to be considered for publication. All submitted materials are subject to acceptance and editing by the Editorial Board of the DCBA BRIEF. Material submitted to the DCBA Brief for possible publication must confirm with the DCBA Brief’s Writers Guidelines (which are available at www. dcbabrief.org). ADVERTISING AND PROMOTION: Reprinted articles in the DCBA BRIEF’s format (with ads removed) are available for purchase. All advertising is subject to approval. Approval and acceptance of an advertisement does not constitute an endorsement or representation of any kind by the DCBA or any of its members as to the advertiser or the advertisement. CONTACT INFORMATION: All articles, comments, criticisms, and suggestions should be directed to Eric Waltmire, eric@ericksonlawgroup.com . Please send change of address notices and any subscription inquiries to: Jacki Hamler, DuPage County Bar Association, 126 South County Farm Road, Wheaton, IL 60187, jhamler@dcba.org.

www.dcbabrief.org